This is exactly what I envision will continue to be in the works, irrespective of which Uniparty candidate is in the White House. As mentioned in the article, much of this is already happening under the present administration. If there is a guaranteed right to freedom of speech, then we need to double down on supporting those organizations at the forefront of challenging such actions as are described in this project. They include:
I am very disappointed in this piece, I want to hear how one can combat the duopoly; I already voted for Jill Stein, I cannot in good consciounce vote for a candidate that supports genocide.
Calling this a "pro-Palestine" movement puts Drop Site News in lockstep with the mainstream media propaganda. In the USA, this is a pro-peace, anti-ethnic cleansing, anti-genocide movement. One thing it is NOT is "anti-Semitic."
The reason this is being prosecuted in the ICC and IJC is not because the victims are Palestinian, Muslim, or Middle Eastern. It is because the people being starved, murdered, and violated are human beings. The prosecutions and the disapproval of the entire world would occur if the victims were Jewish, Irish, Catholics, Progressives, Russians, Chinese, Republicans...whatever. The use of "pro-Palestinian" is a diversion that trivializes a genocide committed by perversely evil people as a political dispute, an ethnic prejudice, or in Vietnam "war" deceit-jargon, a "Police Action." It is more than that, and mainstream media deserves the middle finger gesture for sanitizing what it is with such jargon.
I think Drop Site is using the term Pro-Palestinian because many of these groups characterize themselves that way. And those of us who are opposed to the genocide are called pro-Palestinian even though we are pro-humanity.
Yes..."everybody does it." We can start to change this dialogue right now by callin' it out no matter what outlet does it. "Pro-Palestinian" serves Netanyahu well because he can easily conflate it into "pro-Hamas." I suspect the Israeli government is giving marching orders to easily intimidated corporate news outlets to use it.
I think most of us are right with you on this. If the Democratic Party is so weak that they cannot beat a 34-time convicted felon by just standing up to telling Netanyahu "NO!" on everything from commandeering our military weapons to running our universities and using violence against our own young adults protesting genocidal atrocity, the Democratic "Republican-lite" Party just handed us American citizens to Netanyahu and Trump to govern on a silver platter.
I cannot imagine who would remain a member of it to let it happen again in four years...if this country even sees another election because of the corruption and cowardice of our two cartel parties.
" ... this effort will represent an opportunity for public–private partnership when a willing administration occupies the White House.” Where is this going?
In RW Christian hateful end times propaganda, the whole point of armageddon destroying all groups that won't accept their god, is to establish a 1000 Christian rule over earth. The moral idea that different cultures/countries have their own gods and beliefs which should be respected is not even on the radar of these people. Because they believe they are saved, chosen ... supreme! Added to that engrained arrogant belief is Islamophobia - pushed through one-sided shallow news reporting and racist stereotypes in popular culture like TV programs. So you end up with Project 2025. Unfortunately the Democrats betrayal of Gaza and international humanitarian law has set a very low bar for human rights in America.
I don't know where it's going. Setting aside the propaganda (why propaganda? Does misery love company?), Christian rule means no one else. As I understand it, the Christians think the End Times will come when the Jews are back in Palestine. That's why they're so sympathetic. Not because they give a shit about Jews, but because it gets them to their Rapture, or whatever it is they think is coming. And they don't understand that religions are called beliefs and faiths because they're all made up, with zero evidence, and you just have to have faith and believe in them if you want to.
I don't respect anyone's religious beliefs. I think they're pathetic. I just tolerate them as long as they keep them to themselves, and don't bother other people with them.
I have the same thought you do about Jews: they create the problem about which they complain by telling everyone else they're superior and chosen, by "god." That's no way to make friends. Of course, the Christians are largely no better, and neither are the extremist Muslims.
I grew up with a Catholic mother and atheist father. Went to Catholic school till 14 yrs old when I left the church. I still thank and miss my father for his "permission by example" to think outside the square. Worship of a "sky" god (usually male) for a caring philosophy is one thing, but when religious beliefs are intolerant of others and used to threaten or take lives, they are bad political messaging and should be confronted. History is full of challenges to religious beliefs which oppress human rights, eg womens rights etc. So I remain a happy atheist.
I have a question: are there statutes that prohibit expressing support for the aims of Hamas? In other words, would I incur criminal penalties for openly expressing support for the ultimate aims of Hamas? Wouldn't this be a free speech matter?
The little research I've done implies criminal penalties for MATERIAL support of groups designated as terrorist organizations but I found nothing regarding support purely in the form of speech.
If I defined the ultimate aim of Hamas as freeing the Palestinian people from their Zionist colonizers and the colonizer campaign of ethnic cleansing through expulsion and destruction, why would it be support of terrorism to say I support the aims of Hamas? How would that be any different than Americans supporting the Mau Mau of Kenya in the 1960s?
Our constitutional right to speak freely is being imperiled by this alliance with a colonial anachronism, a right which is foundational to every other we have.
"I have a question: are there statutes that prohibit expressing support for the aims of Hamas? In other words, would I incur criminal penalties for openly expressing support for the ultimate aims of Hamas? Wouldn't this be a free speech matter?"
Last time I looked there were 38 states in which our two cartel parties took away your First Amendment rights some time ago with "anti BDS" loyalty oaths to the government of Israel that censor your right to advocate for a boycott of Israeli corporations and in some cases to even criticize the gangster government of BB Nuts'n'Yahoos.
The operatives of the Democratic Party seem fully in step to hand over the right to govern American citizens to the government of Israel and strip from them the Bill of Rights so long as the AIPAC dollars keep flowing.
Pat, I am waiting to hear of the SC deciding that, seeing no way that they cannot so decide, but if money can be called speech, the Court can make the impossible possible.
The state anti-BDS laws are in two groups. One group prohibits state pension funds from investing in any organization that supports BDS and the other group prohibits state contracts from going to anyone who will not sign a statement of opposition to BDS and renounce participation in BDS. Both groups are denying freedom of speech but the latter is openly sanctioning freedom of speech and is outrageously unconstitutional.
Fred, stick with the fight for liberty and justice for all, the founding fathers would want you to do that as they would expect all Americans to stand up for what the FF's started at risk to themselves. Fleeing political danger is not what patriots do.
Cliff, Benjamin Franklin famously said "if you can keep it." The fact is that we don't want to keep it. I surrender. It's money, influence peddling, murderous attitudes toward our own citizens (there's a difference between pre-Civil War and now, but it's nowhere near what it should be), pervasive corruption. I don't know what the Founding Fathers would want me to do, but they wouldn't want the mess we have frankly worked hard to create for ourselves, and the mess we've made of what they fought and worked to give us.
Add in that there are no good examples of a society that has deteriorated going back to what it was through the effort of the citizenry. Revolution is the usual result and that is no guarantee of restoration, but of something different and not necessarily better. I know of two people who maintain multiple citizenship with the idea that when the going gets tough, go elsewhere. There are not a few leaving Israel now and I can see why...the fanatics have taken over and the people of good intent are a small minority. I believe that in the US, the people of good intent remain at least over 50% and I wouldn't want to reduce their number.
Clif, I agree that given where we are now, nothing but a revolution will straighten us out. And as you say, it might not. But I have to tell you that I'm 74, and I don't have any revolution left in me. It seems like too much of an uphill battle just to dismantle my house, pack it, find a place, sell my place, and move. But if the violent clown wins, I can't stay. Of course I don't trust the polls -- even the most esteemed pollsters say not to trust them -- but considering the difference between Harris and the clown, there should be a 30-40 point difference. And whatever difference there is, it should have gotten a lot larger after Sunday. (You can read my Substack post called "There Must Be a Strategy.") Harris wouldn't have been my first choice, but she and Walz have done a great job of campaigning, and they're a light year better than the clown and JD.
I think the fanatics have taken over here just as they have in Israel. I must say, though, that it was interesting and reassuring that the Georgia Supreme Court said no to gerrymandering, and Mark Robinson seems to be dead in the water. I wish I felt better about the prospect of being rid of Cruz, Hawley, Scott, and some of the others. I don't even feel confident that Greene and Boebert won't get elected. It's all very defeating. And it was made significantly more so when McConnell fucked up the SCOTUS. That has cost us a lot.
Have you read "The Master Plan" (or listened as it is a series of podcasts) over at David Sirota's site called The Lever? It is a detailed account of how it is no accident that we are where we are today and it all started with a memo from Lewis Powell before he became a member of the SC back in the 1970's. No secret conspiracy, the details are on the record. This plan has realized all of the points Powell made in his memo written out of a fear for the future of capitalism. All the power of the wealthy and the right came together to make it happen. I subscribe to The Lever, but I believe The Master Plan is available for anyone to read/listen at https://the.levernews.com/master-plan/#about-1
Clif, I think I listened to one episode of it. I really like/liked "The Lever," and I think Sirota and Singh do a great job, but every post is just another example of the same problem: how money corrupts political functioning and this country. I already know that. Of course, "The Lever" is reporting, and it's not their job to make anything change (clearly, they want it to) but I need change. It doesn't do me any good to know that I have accurately identified the problem. And then, you get a president like Biden, who keeps backing Netanyahu, immediately after which he attends an AIPAC event, and an alternative choice like Harris, who says she wouldn't do anything different, and it's all very defeating and deflating. Maybe the young'uns will do something right, but I won't live that long.
Besides, probably all of who subscribe to real news lists like this are already on the lists that big tech has turned over to the other members of the ruling class. If we try to leave the country, we'll find we are on "no-fly" list because we have left a well-traveled digital trail of being disloyal to ruling class, authoritarian, corporate narcissists running both parties.
Prophet Song by Paul Lynch, which won the Booker Prize last year, describes an eerily similar scenario. The book is fiction and takes place in Ireland, but its similarities to what has been taking place here in the United States with the suppression of free speech, prosecution and jailing of whistleblowers and journalists is a chilling prediction of how fragile democracy is and how easily we can slide into authoritarianism/ fascism. As Hemingway wrote, gradually, then suddenly.
If your actions and opinions are not favourable to the Zionists the they are clearly supporting anti semitic terrorism . There is no middle. ground in Nineteen Eighty Four
This is exactly what I envision will continue to be in the works, irrespective of which Uniparty candidate is in the White House. As mentioned in the article, much of this is already happening under the present administration. If there is a guaranteed right to freedom of speech, then we need to double down on supporting those organizations at the forefront of challenging such actions as are described in this project. They include:
The Center for Constitutional Rights at https://ccrjustice.org/
The FIRE at
https://www.thefire.org/defending-your-rights/legal-support/fire-legal-network
Rights and Dissent at RightsAndDissent.org
Palestine Legal
hhttps://palestinelegal.org/ttps://www.rightsanddissent.org
Please give them your support!
I am very disappointed in this piece, I want to hear how one can combat the duopoly; I already voted for Jill Stein, I cannot in good consciounce vote for a candidate that supports genocide.
Calling this a "pro-Palestine" movement puts Drop Site News in lockstep with the mainstream media propaganda. In the USA, this is a pro-peace, anti-ethnic cleansing, anti-genocide movement. One thing it is NOT is "anti-Semitic."
The reason this is being prosecuted in the ICC and IJC is not because the victims are Palestinian, Muslim, or Middle Eastern. It is because the people being starved, murdered, and violated are human beings. The prosecutions and the disapproval of the entire world would occur if the victims were Jewish, Irish, Catholics, Progressives, Russians, Chinese, Republicans...whatever. The use of "pro-Palestinian" is a diversion that trivializes a genocide committed by perversely evil people as a political dispute, an ethnic prejudice, or in Vietnam "war" deceit-jargon, a "Police Action." It is more than that, and mainstream media deserves the middle finger gesture for sanitizing what it is with such jargon.
I think Drop Site is using the term Pro-Palestinian because many of these groups characterize themselves that way. And those of us who are opposed to the genocide are called pro-Palestinian even though we are pro-humanity.
Yes..."everybody does it." We can start to change this dialogue right now by callin' it out no matter what outlet does it. "Pro-Palestinian" serves Netanyahu well because he can easily conflate it into "pro-Hamas." I suspect the Israeli government is giving marching orders to easily intimidated corporate news outlets to use it.
Call me less "pro Palestine" and more "anti killing children to steal their parent's land"
I think most of us are right with you on this. If the Democratic Party is so weak that they cannot beat a 34-time convicted felon by just standing up to telling Netanyahu "NO!" on everything from commandeering our military weapons to running our universities and using violence against our own young adults protesting genocidal atrocity, the Democratic "Republican-lite" Party just handed us American citizens to Netanyahu and Trump to govern on a silver platter.
I cannot imagine who would remain a member of it to let it happen again in four years...if this country even sees another election because of the corruption and cowardice of our two cartel parties.
Agreed.
Well hell, the United States of Zion.
Project Esther another Zionist attack against freedom in their constant
effort to take over the US. Its the Palestinians and the Americans.
" ... this effort will represent an opportunity for public–private partnership when a willing administration occupies the White House.” Where is this going?
In RW Christian hateful end times propaganda, the whole point of armageddon destroying all groups that won't accept their god, is to establish a 1000 Christian rule over earth. The moral idea that different cultures/countries have their own gods and beliefs which should be respected is not even on the radar of these people. Because they believe they are saved, chosen ... supreme! Added to that engrained arrogant belief is Islamophobia - pushed through one-sided shallow news reporting and racist stereotypes in popular culture like TV programs. So you end up with Project 2025. Unfortunately the Democrats betrayal of Gaza and international humanitarian law has set a very low bar for human rights in America.
I don't know where it's going. Setting aside the propaganda (why propaganda? Does misery love company?), Christian rule means no one else. As I understand it, the Christians think the End Times will come when the Jews are back in Palestine. That's why they're so sympathetic. Not because they give a shit about Jews, but because it gets them to their Rapture, or whatever it is they think is coming. And they don't understand that religions are called beliefs and faiths because they're all made up, with zero evidence, and you just have to have faith and believe in them if you want to.
I don't respect anyone's religious beliefs. I think they're pathetic. I just tolerate them as long as they keep them to themselves, and don't bother other people with them.
I have the same thought you do about Jews: they create the problem about which they complain by telling everyone else they're superior and chosen, by "god." That's no way to make friends. Of course, the Christians are largely no better, and neither are the extremist Muslims.
I grew up with a Catholic mother and atheist father. Went to Catholic school till 14 yrs old when I left the church. I still thank and miss my father for his "permission by example" to think outside the square. Worship of a "sky" god (usually male) for a caring philosophy is one thing, but when religious beliefs are intolerant of others and used to threaten or take lives, they are bad political messaging and should be confronted. History is full of challenges to religious beliefs which oppress human rights, eg womens rights etc. So I remain a happy atheist.
Just found this plea from a New Zealand writer for religions to "get off the fence" and take an anti genocide stand.
https://www.solidarity.co.nz
I have a question: are there statutes that prohibit expressing support for the aims of Hamas? In other words, would I incur criminal penalties for openly expressing support for the ultimate aims of Hamas? Wouldn't this be a free speech matter?
The little research I've done implies criminal penalties for MATERIAL support of groups designated as terrorist organizations but I found nothing regarding support purely in the form of speech.
If I defined the ultimate aim of Hamas as freeing the Palestinian people from their Zionist colonizers and the colonizer campaign of ethnic cleansing through expulsion and destruction, why would it be support of terrorism to say I support the aims of Hamas? How would that be any different than Americans supporting the Mau Mau of Kenya in the 1960s?
Our constitutional right to speak freely is being imperiled by this alliance with a colonial anachronism, a right which is foundational to every other we have.
"I have a question: are there statutes that prohibit expressing support for the aims of Hamas? In other words, would I incur criminal penalties for openly expressing support for the ultimate aims of Hamas? Wouldn't this be a free speech matter?"
Last time I looked there were 38 states in which our two cartel parties took away your First Amendment rights some time ago with "anti BDS" loyalty oaths to the government of Israel that censor your right to advocate for a boycott of Israeli corporations and in some cases to even criticize the gangster government of BB Nuts'n'Yahoos.
The operatives of the Democratic Party seem fully in step to hand over the right to govern American citizens to the government of Israel and strip from them the Bill of Rights so long as the AIPAC dollars keep flowing.
I thought SCOTUS had declared these unconstitutional.
Pat, I am waiting to hear of the SC deciding that, seeing no way that they cannot so decide, but if money can be called speech, the Court can make the impossible possible.
The state anti-BDS laws are in two groups. One group prohibits state pension funds from investing in any organization that supports BDS and the other group prohibits state contracts from going to anyone who will not sign a statement of opposition to BDS and renounce participation in BDS. Both groups are denying freedom of speech but the latter is openly sanctioning freedom of speech and is outrageously unconstitutional.
Which SCOTUS, and declared what unConstitutional? The current SCOTUS changes its mind every 20 minutes, except it always runs interference for Donnie.
Judaism is a religion not a race and Palestinian Arabs are Semites.
NOTHING is more antisemitic than Zionism and it's not even close.
I'm going to make it easy for him/them to suppress me. I'm too old for this, but I'll move to another country.
Fred, stick with the fight for liberty and justice for all, the founding fathers would want you to do that as they would expect all Americans to stand up for what the FF's started at risk to themselves. Fleeing political danger is not what patriots do.
Cliff, Benjamin Franklin famously said "if you can keep it." The fact is that we don't want to keep it. I surrender. It's money, influence peddling, murderous attitudes toward our own citizens (there's a difference between pre-Civil War and now, but it's nowhere near what it should be), pervasive corruption. I don't know what the Founding Fathers would want me to do, but they wouldn't want the mess we have frankly worked hard to create for ourselves, and the mess we've made of what they fought and worked to give us.
Add in that there are no good examples of a society that has deteriorated going back to what it was through the effort of the citizenry. Revolution is the usual result and that is no guarantee of restoration, but of something different and not necessarily better. I know of two people who maintain multiple citizenship with the idea that when the going gets tough, go elsewhere. There are not a few leaving Israel now and I can see why...the fanatics have taken over and the people of good intent are a small minority. I believe that in the US, the people of good intent remain at least over 50% and I wouldn't want to reduce their number.
Clif, I agree that given where we are now, nothing but a revolution will straighten us out. And as you say, it might not. But I have to tell you that I'm 74, and I don't have any revolution left in me. It seems like too much of an uphill battle just to dismantle my house, pack it, find a place, sell my place, and move. But if the violent clown wins, I can't stay. Of course I don't trust the polls -- even the most esteemed pollsters say not to trust them -- but considering the difference between Harris and the clown, there should be a 30-40 point difference. And whatever difference there is, it should have gotten a lot larger after Sunday. (You can read my Substack post called "There Must Be a Strategy.") Harris wouldn't have been my first choice, but she and Walz have done a great job of campaigning, and they're a light year better than the clown and JD.
I think the fanatics have taken over here just as they have in Israel. I must say, though, that it was interesting and reassuring that the Georgia Supreme Court said no to gerrymandering, and Mark Robinson seems to be dead in the water. I wish I felt better about the prospect of being rid of Cruz, Hawley, Scott, and some of the others. I don't even feel confident that Greene and Boebert won't get elected. It's all very defeating. And it was made significantly more so when McConnell fucked up the SCOTUS. That has cost us a lot.
Fred, you and I are the same age.
Have you read "The Master Plan" (or listened as it is a series of podcasts) over at David Sirota's site called The Lever? It is a detailed account of how it is no accident that we are where we are today and it all started with a memo from Lewis Powell before he became a member of the SC back in the 1970's. No secret conspiracy, the details are on the record. This plan has realized all of the points Powell made in his memo written out of a fear for the future of capitalism. All the power of the wealthy and the right came together to make it happen. I subscribe to The Lever, but I believe The Master Plan is available for anyone to read/listen at https://the.levernews.com/master-plan/#about-1
Clif, I think I listened to one episode of it. I really like/liked "The Lever," and I think Sirota and Singh do a great job, but every post is just another example of the same problem: how money corrupts political functioning and this country. I already know that. Of course, "The Lever" is reporting, and it's not their job to make anything change (clearly, they want it to) but I need change. It doesn't do me any good to know that I have accurately identified the problem. And then, you get a president like Biden, who keeps backing Netanyahu, immediately after which he attends an AIPAC event, and an alternative choice like Harris, who says she wouldn't do anything different, and it's all very defeating and deflating. Maybe the young'uns will do something right, but I won't live that long.
Besides, probably all of who subscribe to real news lists like this are already on the lists that big tech has turned over to the other members of the ruling class. If we try to leave the country, we'll find we are on "no-fly" list because we have left a well-traveled digital trail of being disloyal to ruling class, authoritarian, corporate narcissists running both parties.
Surely the Democrats, being such opponents of Project 2025 will be ready to come to the defense of the anti-genocide movement?
Yeah, I'm kidding. 🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂
Prophet Song by Paul Lynch, which won the Booker Prize last year, describes an eerily similar scenario. The book is fiction and takes place in Ireland, but its similarities to what has been taking place here in the United States with the suppression of free speech, prosecution and jailing of whistleblowers and journalists is a chilling prediction of how fragile democracy is and how easily we can slide into authoritarianism/ fascism. As Hemingway wrote, gradually, then suddenly.
Not sure I see much of a difference between what the Republican Party fascists want and what the Democratic Party fascists want.
If your actions and opinions are not favourable to the Zionists the they are clearly supporting anti semitic terrorism . There is no middle. ground in Nineteen Eighty Four
Scary shit...