I don't play vidio games. Guess I could sell the few stocks I own in my portfolio.
Isreali tentacles are long and deep. they probably have a naughty list given to them by our social media outlet broligarchs along with facial recognition, our words and actions and posts and pictures and buying habits and travel habits, our sex habits. If you are willing to pay social media data sets are available. This is in violation of my civil liberties, my rights to privay. Social media is watching you're every move in your domicile and out there in the world. No warrent required. This is the faustian bargin we all made to access the internet of things. Now we need to figure way of controlling it and if we can't do that we need to get our freedoms back. Otherwise we be the surfs and the lords of the internet our kings.
Wait—what exactly are you talking about? Social media only has access to the information you gave them. You accepted the terms of service, you clicked the permissions. That’s not some hidden trap—it’s right there in the agreement.
Like, I fully understand what happens with my data—and I’m fine with it. That’s why I use these services. If I weren’t fine with it, I wouldn’t use them. That’s the trade-off. So what exactly is the argument here?
They’re not watching your every move unless you let them—by turning on GPS, syncing your phone, using smart devices, and posting everything about your life. That’s not surveillance—it’s just you handing over data.
At the end of the day, it’s your choice to use these platforms. Like anything else, it has pros and cons. You do your own cost-benefit assessment. And clearly—you did the assessment, and you’re still using them. Soooo… what’s the problem here? You're just bitching about your own choice?
I don't play vidio games. Guess I could sell the few stocks I own in my portfolio.
Isreali tentacles are long and deep. they probably have a naughty list given to them by our social media outlet broligarchs along with facial recognition, our words and actions and posts and pictures and buying habits and travel habits, our sex habits. If you are willing to pay social media data sets are available. This is in violation of my civil liberties, my rights to privay. Social media is watching you're every move in your domicile and out there in the world. No warrent required. This is the faustian bargin we all made to access the internet of things. Now we need to figure way of controlling it and if we can't do that we need to get our freedoms back. Otherwise we be the surfs and the lords of the internet our kings.
Wait—what exactly are you talking about? Social media only has access to the information you gave them. You accepted the terms of service, you clicked the permissions. That’s not some hidden trap—it’s right there in the agreement.
Like, I fully understand what happens with my data—and I’m fine with it. That’s why I use these services. If I weren’t fine with it, I wouldn’t use them. That’s the trade-off. So what exactly is the argument here?
They’re not watching your every move unless you let them—by turning on GPS, syncing your phone, using smart devices, and posting everything about your life. That’s not surveillance—it’s just you handing over data.
At the end of the day, it’s your choice to use these platforms. Like anything else, it has pros and cons. You do your own cost-benefit assessment. And clearly—you did the assessment, and you’re still using them. Soooo… what’s the problem here? You're just bitching about your own choice?